Find the discussion that fits.
Browse focused conversations about bisexual identity, coming out, relationships, wellbeing, safety, community, and representation. Read as a guest and create a free account when you want to reply.
Read quietly • Reply when ready • Share only what feels safe
Bisexuality can be difficult to find in historical accounts, even when a person had meaningful relationships, attractions, or intimate connections involving more than one gender.
Historical figures are often described as straight or gay according to the relationship that receives the most attention.
At other times, attraction to more than one gender may be treated as experimentation, dismissed as irrelevant, or left unnamed because modern identity labels did not exist in exactly the same form.
That creates a difficult balance.
We should be careful not to assign certainty to people who did not describe themselves in their own words.
At the same time, removing complexity from their lives can create the false impression that bisexual people have little history, culture, or continuity.
Historical erasure can affect the present in subtle ways.
If bisexuality appears to be something mainly visible in modern dating culture, social media, or recent entertainment, people may assume that it is new, rare, unstable, or simply a temporary stage between heterosexuality and homosexuality.
That can also affect self-recognition.
Someone looking back at history may struggle to find examples of people whose lives included attraction, relationships, or emotional connections across more than one gender.
When those possibilities are consistently rewritten into simpler categories, bisexual experiences can become harder to recognise both in the past and in ourselves.
A more nuanced approach does not require forcing a modern label onto every historical figure.
It can mean acknowledging uncertainty while also allowing room for lives that do not fit neatly into a straight-or-gay framework.
It can also mean asking how historians, biographers, museums, schools, documentaries, and popular culture choose which relationships or parts of a person’s life receive attention.
Sometimes erasure is intentional.
At other times, it can happen because the language available to describe sexuality has changed, because surviving evidence is incomplete, or because later generations interpret complex lives through categories that feel more familiar to them.
The goal is not to prove that every ambiguous historical figure was bisexual.
It is to avoid treating bisexuality as impossible whenever someone’s life does not fit a simple category.
Have historical stories or figures changed how you understood bisexuality?
Have you ever encountered a historical person whose relationships or attractions seemed more complex than the label commonly used for them?
How should we discuss possible bisexual lives without erasing complexity—or presenting speculation as certainty?
And does seeing bisexuality as part of a longer history change the way you understand bisexual identity today?
Please allow room for historical uncertainty. Avoid presenting speculation about a person’s sexuality as confirmed fact, and avoid assuming that modern identity labels always map perfectly onto people from another time or culture.